“A doctor’s quest to perform the very finest consultation for the safety of the patient has been misinterpreted in a duplicitous manner to suggest there has been an act of racism committed.
“I absolutely no longer want to be a doctor.”
During the incident, the Muslim mother said her daughter, who was 10 or 11, could be suffering from tonsillitis.
He described what happened next: “I asked her, would you kindly remove your face veil please because it makes communication very difficult.”
Adding: “Normally this issue doesn’t arise because patients automatically do so.
“One would think that any parent would be wholly supportive and grateful that a doctor was trying to safely treat their child.”
Dr Wolverson says the mother lifted the veil without any objections, but her husband arrived half an hour and accused the GP.
“He sat outside my consultation room and threateningly made eye contact towards me whenever I went out to fetch each patient,” Dr Wolverson said.
“He then made a formal complaint and I was prevented from working at the walk-in centre again.”
Now, NHS bosses have reportedly sent the General Medical Council, which has the power to sack the doc, a form outlining the complaints.
It says he refused to continue the consultation unless the woman removed the garment, even though she did not want to on religious grounds,
The form also claims the doctor was “rude” and “gave her a dirty look”.
In the woman’s account, she was left shocked, crying, and feeling “victimised and racially discriminated” against.
Joyce Robins, from Patient Concern, said losing a doctor over the issue would be “criminal’.
She blasted: “A doctor needs to be sensitive to a patient’s religion but safety must always come first.”
A spokesman for The Doctors’ Association UK said: “It is of utmost importance that the religious wishes of our patients are respected.
“However, evidently there are some circumstances where removal of a niqab or burka is necessary for medical assessment and treatment.
“The GMC should consider issuing clear guidelines to protect both doctors and our patients.”
Source: Read Full Article