US walks back claim Russia put bounties on troops — but no Biden apology to Trump

More On:


Joe cools his jets: Biden declares national emergency at Ukraine-Russia border — but calls back US warships

Russian military vehicles with ‘invasion stripes’ descend on Ukraine border

Russian retribution: White House to reportedly announce sanctions on Russia

Biden and Putin float possible summit after prez branded Russian strongman a ‘killer’

The US government on Thursday downplayed a bombshell report that Russia may have placed bounties on US troops in Afghanistan — but White House press secretary Jen Psaki dodged questions about whether President Biden regrets attacking former President Donald Trump over the issue.

A senior administration official told a group of reporters that the US intelligence community “assesses with low to moderate confidence that Russian intelligence officers sought to encourage Taliban attacks [on] U.S. and coalition personnel in Afghanistan in 2019 and perhaps earlier.”

The allegation that Russia offered cash to the Taliban to kill US troops was politically explosive last year during the presidential campaign. Biden repeatedly attacked Trump for not punishing Russia over the claim.

Biden said in June, “President Trump, the commander in chief of American troops serving in a dangerous theater of war, has known about this for months, according to the [New York] Times, and done worse than nothing.”

Trump administration officials said at the time that the intelligence was unverified.

Psaki fended off multiple reporter questions about whether Biden now regrets his attacks on Trump, given the low to moderate confidence in the claim.

“I’m not going to speak to the previous administration, but I will say that we had enough concern about these reports and about the targeting of our men and women serving … that we wanted our intelligence community to look into it,” Psaki said.

“There are several factors that contributed to the low to moderate confidence in the judgment, including the difficulty of the operating environment, and of course the reliance on detainee reporting. At the same time, we still feel there are questions to be answered by the Russian government.”

Share this article:

Source: Read Full Article