Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.<\/p>\n
Melburnians who live in medium-density parts of the city report higher levels of liveability than those in either the sky-scraper-dominated CBD or greenfield housing developments on the city\u2019s fringe, a social research survey has found.<\/p>\n
The consultants behind the 2023 Australian Liveability Census published on Thursday say the results should serve as a guide for the Victorian government as it embarks on its ambitious housing project to densify Melbourne\u2019s inner and middle suburbs, and more than double the number of homes built each year to 80,000 per annum for the next decade.<\/p>\n
More than 26,000 Australians \u2013 including more than 3000 Victorians \u2013 were surveyed by planning consultancy company Place Score between March and June this year and asked to score their local area on 50 different attributes. They included ease of moving around their suburbs, quality of local shops and open space, things to do at night and how socially connected they felt.<\/p>\n
Each area is allocated a rating out of 100. PlaceScore says its methodology has been peer-reviewed by Macquarie University.<\/p>\n
Three Victorian local government areas made the top 10 list for the country. Boroondara, which takes in the eastern suburbs of Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn, came in fourth place with a score of 77, followed by Surf Coast Shire (77) on the Great Ocean Road in fifth place.<\/p>\n
Port Phillip Council, which includes St Kilda, Middle Park and Elwood, came in ninth spot with a score of 76.<\/p>\n
The survey also found that the top 10 densest LGAs across the country on average experienced 8 per cent better liveability than the national average.<\/p>\n
Across metropolitan Melbourne \u2013 excluding the Mornington Peninsula \u2013 the top five most liveable council areas also included Bayside in the inner south-east, Darebin in the inner north and Stonnington in the inner east.<\/p>\n
But there were differences between what people rated highly in those areas. The top contributing factor to Stonnington and Port Phillip\u2019s score was \u201caccess to neighbourhood amenities\u201d, while for Bayside, it was \u201cphysical comfort\u201d.<\/p>\n
For residents in Boroondara and Darebin, access to \u201clocal businesses that provide for daily needs\u201d was the biggest factor in their high liveability score.<\/p>\n
Kylie Legge, chief executive of Place Score and an urban planner, said both the national and Melbourne trends were similar: the best-performing local government areas tended to be older with mature trees and local strip shops and services, while the worst-performing were outer suburban areas with rapidly growing greenfield developments and often lagging infrastructure.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Growing greenfield housing developments in Melton in Melbourne\u2019s outer west.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Joe Armao<\/cite><\/p>\n \u201cAcross metro Melbourne, the various regions are performing better than the national average everywhere except for in the western region [Wyndham, Melton, Brimbank, Maribyrnong, Hobsons Bay], which is unfortunately performing significantly lower,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Liveability scores in the west ranged from 70 to 75 per cent in Hobsons Bay, which includes the bayside suburb of Williamstown, to 55 to 60 per cent in Wyndham, which reaches the western fringe of the city.<\/p>\n \u201cThat is always concerning for us when we see an area where the people themselves are really unsatisfied with what their neighbourhoods are actually providing for them,\u201d Legge said.<\/p>\n \u201cIt also happens to be some of the fastest-growing areas where a huge proportion of housing is planned. So there\u2019s a real disconnect there between putting as many lives as possible in the place that is currently the most unliveable.\u201d<\/p>\n The median price for a three-bedroom home in Kew in Boroondara is $2.1 million, in Middle Park in Port Phillip council it is $2.46 million \u2013 while in Melton in the outer west it is $449,000, according to Domain.<\/p>\n Source: Place Score<\/p>\n The survey asked participants how likely they would be to recommend their area to others to live.<\/p>\n \u201cIn metropolitan Melbourne, only people living in the western region are unwilling to recommend that place as a place to live,\u201d Legge said.<\/p>\n She said the data should be applied to the state government\u2019s 10-year plan to rectify the imbalance of homes being built in established areas of Melbourne and those in greenfield developments.<\/p>\n Her firm\u2019s research, she argued, showed it was clear that it was not the highest skyscraper-dominated areas nor sprawling, car-dependent greenfield developments where people were most content but somewhere in between; neighbourhoods with multiple local centres, parks, green streets and a mix of apartment buildings from three to 12 storeys, terraces, townhouses and some larger stand-alone homes, too.<\/p>\n St Kilda Beach foreshore. Port Phillip Council has made it onto the top 10 local government areas in the country for liveability, as rated by residents.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Darrian Traynor<\/cite><\/p>\n \u201cEverything they\u2019re asking for us is all good stuff \u2013 there\u2019s nothing crazy. We want green, walkable, compact and well-maintained neighbourhoods,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Kew local Winston Todd, 49, has lived in the Boroondara area for the vast majority of his life and says he\u2019s never had cause to live elsewhere because of how good the amenity is.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m a parent now. So there\u2019s great schools around here. Heaps of great public parks. We\u2019ve got a river nearby and that\u2019s a fabulous resource, terrific transport,\u201d he said.<\/p>\nAustralia\u2019s most livable local government areas<\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n