The bill was passed in October in the southern city of Porto Alegre and councillor Ramiro Rosario revealed this week that it was written by a chatbot, sparking objections and raising questions about the role of artificial intelligence in public policy.<\/p>\n
Rosario said he asked OpenAI\u2019s chatbot ChatGPT to craft a proposal to prevent the city from charging taxpayers to replace water consumption meters if they were stolen. He then presented it to his 35 peers on the council without making a single change or even letting them know about its unprecedented origin.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Lawmakers in Brazil\u2019s southern city of Porto Alegre Brazil have enacted legislation written entirely by artificial intelligence. <\/span>Credit: <\/span>AP<\/cite><\/p>\n \u201cIf I had revealed it before, the proposal certainly wouldn\u2019t even have been taken to a vote,\u201d Rosario said. The 36-member council approved it unanimously and the local law went into effect on November 23.<\/p>\n \u201cIt would be unfair to the population to run the risk of the project not being approved simply because it was written by artificial intelligence,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n The arrival of ChatGPT on the marketplace just a year ago has sparked a global debate about the impacts of potentially revolutionary AI-powered chatbots. While some see it as a promising tool, it has also caused concerns and anxiety about the unintended or undesired impacts of a machine handling tasks currently performed by humans.<\/p>\n Beira Rio Stadium in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Getty<\/cite><\/p>\n Porto Alegre, with a population of 1.3 million, is the second-largest city in Brazil\u2019s south. Its council president, Hamilton Sossmeier, found out that Rosario had enlisted ChatGPT when the councilman bragged about the achievement on social media on Wednesday. Sossmeier at first told local media he thought it was a \u201cdangerous precedent\u201d.<\/p>\n The AI large language models that power chatbots like ChatGPT work by repeatedly trying to guess the next word in a sentence and are prone to making up false information, a phenomenon sometimes called hallucination.<\/p>\n All chatbots sometimes introduce false information when summarising a document, ranging from about 3 per cent of the time for the most advanced GPT model to a rate of about 27 per cent for one of Google\u2019s models, according to recently published research by the tech company Vectara.<\/p>\n In an article published on the website of Harvard Law School\u2019s Centre of Legal Profession earlier this year, Andrew Perlman, dean at Suffolk University Law School, wrote that ChatGPT \u201cmay portend an even more momentous shift than the advent of the internet,\u201d but also warned of its potential shortcomings.<\/p>\n \u201cIt may not always be able to account for the nuances and complexities of the law. Because ChatGPT is a machine learning system, it may not have the same level of understanding and judgment as a human lawyer when it comes to interpreting legal principles and precedent. This could lead to problems in situations where a more in-depth legal analysis is required,\u201d Perlman wrote.<\/p>\n Porto Alegre\u2019s Rosario wasn\u2019t the first lawmaker in the world to test ChatGPT\u2019s abilities. Others have done so in a more limited capacity or with less successful outcomes.<\/p>\n In Massachusetts, Democratic state Senator Barry Finegold turned to ChatGPT to help write a bill aimed at regulating artificial intelligence models, including ChatGPT. Filed earlier this year, it has yet to be voted on.<\/p>\n Finegold said ChatGPT could help with some of the more tedious elements of the lawmaking process, including correctly and quickly searching and citing laws already on the books. However, it is critical that everyone knows ChatGPT or a similar tool was used in the process, he added.<\/p>\n \u201cWe want work that is ChatGPT generated to be watermarked,\u201d he said, adding that the use of artificial intelligence to help draft new laws is inevitable. \u201cI\u2019m in favour of people using ChatGPT to write bills as long as it\u2019s clear.\u201d<\/p>\n There was no such transparency for Rosario\u2019s proposal in Porto Alegre. Sossmeier said Rosario did not inform fellow council members that ChatGPT had written the proposal.<\/p>\n Keeping it secret was intentional. Rosario said his objective was not just to resolve a local issue, but also to spark a debate. He said he entered a 49-word prompt into ChatGPT and it returned the full draft proposal within seconds, including justifications.<\/p>\n \u201cI am convinced that … humanity will experience a new technological revolution,\u201d he said. \u201cAll the tools we have developed as a civilisation can be used for evil and good. That\u2019s why we have to show how it can be used for good.\u201d<\/p>\n And the council president, who initially decried the method, already appears to have been swayed.<\/p>\n \u201cI changed my mind,\u201d Sossmeier said. \u201cI started to read more in depth and saw that, unfortunately or fortunately, this is going to be a trend.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p>\n